Scenario:
The organization opens a new branch, plant, or office.
Action:
The user creates a new location by entering location code, name, company, and basic details.
Outcome:
The company location is created and available for ERP transactions.
Scenario:
The address, contact, or statutory details of a location change.
Action:
The user updates the relevant location information in the master.
Outcome:
Updated details are reflected across all dependent transactions and reports.
Scenario:
The ERP supports multiple companies under one system.
Action:
The user maps the location to the appropriate company.
Outcome:
The location is available only under the selected company structure.
Scenario:
The location requires GST or other statutory compliance.
Action:
The user defines tax applicability, GST type, and registration details.
Outcome:
The system applies correct tax rules for transactions at that location.
Scenario:
The accurate address is required for billing, shipping, and compliance.
Action:
The user enters complete location address details.
Outcome:
The address is used in invoices, delivery documents, and statutory reports.
Scenario:
The location operates within a specific geographical jurisdiction.
Action:
The user selects the applicable state and country.
Outcome:
The ERP enables correct tax calculation and regulatory reporting.
Scenario:
A location becomes operational or is temporarily closed.
Action:
The user marks the location as active or inactive.
Outcome:
Inactive locations are restricted from transaction usage.
Scenario:
Not all locations are allowed to perform all transactions.
Action:
User configures transaction permissions for the location.
Outcome:
ERP enforces transaction controls based on location setup.
Scenario:
The management requires branch‑wise operational and financial data.
Action:
The system groups transactions and data by location.
Outcome:
Accurate location wise reports and dashboards are generated.
Scenario:
The location is required across multiple ERP modules.
Action:
The system integrates location with Inventory, HR, Finance, Sales, and MES.
Outcome:
Seamless cross‑module data consistency is maintained.
Scenario:
The auditors require traceability of location‑based transactions.
Action:
The system maintains audit trails linked to the location.
Outcome:
Compliance and audit requirements are met effectively.